The "Mcdonald's Coffee" Case

The "Mcdonald's Coffee" Case

Cincinnati Accident Attorney - The "Mcdonald's Coffee" Case Hello everybody. Now, I discovered Cincinnati Accident Attorney - The "Mcdonald's Coffee" Case. Which may be very helpful in my opinion therefore you.

In one of the most widely misreported and misunderstood cases in recent memory, a Albuquerque, New Mexico jury awarded 79 year-old Stella Liebeck .9 million for severe burns suffered after she spilled a cup of McDonald's coffee, which she had located between her knees. What I said. It isn't the actual final outcome that the actual about Cincinnati Accident Attorney. You see this article for info on what you need to know is Cincinnati Accident Attorney. Cincinnati Accident Attorney The jury's award was for 0,000 in compensatory damages and .7 million for punitive damages (because of McDonald's callous conduct). The jury also found Mrs. Liebeck 20% negligent, reducing the compensatory damages to 0,000. The trial judge also reduced the punitive damages to 0,000. Mrs. Liebeck did not receive .9 million, or .86 million, or 0,000. The parties entered a post-verdict village for a undisclosed amount. (States have different legal standards with respect to negligence. New Mexico uses a comparative negligence rule, which assigns blame and, therefore, judgments proportionally. Other states such as North Carolina use a contributory negligence standard, which bars a plaintiff from saving if their actions contributed even 1% to the accident!) The Facts Of The Case Mrs. Liebeck, while a passenger in her grandson's car, purchased a cup of coffee at the drive-through window at McDonalds. While the car was stopped, she located the cup securely between her knees and attempted to take off the lid. The cup accidentally tipped over and poured the scalding (180-190¡ Fahrenheit) hot water onto her lap. She suffered third-degree burns over 16 percent of her body. During her eight day hospitalization she underwent skin grafting and painful whirlpool medicine for debridement (removal of damaged tissue) of her wounds. She has extensive scarring and was disabled for more than two years. Despite these very painful and debilitating injuries and their expensive healing treatment, Mrs. Liebeck offered to rule with McDonald's for ,000. McDonald's refused to rule and the case went to trial. Facts Presented At Trail The jury heard the following evidence in the case: o McDonalds's coffee sales are .3 million per day. o By corporate specifications, McDonald's sells its coffee at 180 to 190 degrees Fahrenheit; Coffee at that temperature, if spilled, causes third-degree burns (the skin is burned away down to the muscle/fatty-tissue layer) in two to seven seconds; Third-degree burns do not heal without skin grafting, debridement and whirlpool treatments that cost tens of thousands of dollars and corollary in permanent disfigurement, ultimate pain and disability of the victim for many months, and in some cases, years; o The chairman of the branch of mechanical engineering and bio-mechanical engineering at the University of Texas testified that this risk of harm is unacceptable, as did a widely recognized scholar on burns, the editor in chief of the foremost scholarly publication in the specialty, the Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation; o McDonald's admitted that it has known about the risk of serious burns from its scalding hot coffee for more than 10 years -- the risk was brought to its concentration straight through numerous other claims and suits, to no avail; o From 1982 to 1992, McDonald's coffee burned more than 700 people, many receiving severe burns to the genital area, perineum, inner thighs, and buttocks; o Not only men and women, but also children and infants, have been burned by McDonald's scalding hot coffee, in some instances due to inadvertent spillage by McDonald's employees; o At least one woman had coffee dropped in her lap straight through the assistance window, causing third-degree burns to her inner thighs and other sensitive areas, which resulted in disability for years; o Witnesses for McDonald's admitted in court that consumers are unaware of the extent of the risk of serious burns from spilled coffee served at McDonald's required temperature; o McDonald's admitted that it did not warn customers of the nature and extent of this risk and could offer no explanation as to why it did not; o McDonald's witnesses testified that it did not intend to turn down the heat -- As one examine put it: "No, there is no current plan to convert the policy that we're using in that regard right now;" o McDonald's admitted that its coffee is "not fit for consumption" when sold because it causes severe scalds if spilled or drunk; o Liebeck's treating physician testified that her injury was one of the worst scald burns he had ever seen. o Moreover, the Shriner's Burn form in Cincinnati had published warnings to the franchise food manufactures that its members were unnecessarily causing serious scald burns by serving beverages above 130 degrees Fahrenheit. In refusing to grant a new trial in the case, Judge Robert Scott called McDonald's behavior "callous." Moreover, "the day after the verdict, the news media documented that coffee at the McDonald's in Albuquerque [where Liebeck was burned] is now sold at 158 degrees. This will cause third-degree burns in about 60 seconds, rather than in two to seven seconds [so that], the margin of safety has been increased as a direct consequence of this verdict." By Wayne C Walker, President of Capital Transaction Group Inc. A leader in litigation financial services - http://www.captran.com. This data is concept and not intended to be legal advice. Readers should not act on this data without seeking the advice of a competent attorney. © 2003 CapTran I hope you have new knowledge about Cincinnati Accident Attorney. Where you possibly can offer easy use in your evryday life. And most importantly, your reaction is passed. Read more.. The "Mcdonald's Coffee" Case.